reality blurred

Baby Bachelor is the hilariously cute parody you need to watch right now

Andy Dehnart — Fri, 24 May 2013 12:05:33 -0500

Just when you think it's impossible to do a better parody of The Bachelor comes The Baby Bachelor from Jimmy Kimmel Live. Its second episode was released this week, and while Burning Love did a great job of sending up the ABC series, I think this is my favorite.

The quote-unquote series, starring Kimmel's nephew Wesley, is both hilarious parody and impossible cuteness all in one. As with all reality TV, the authentic, unplannned moments between the babies are much funnier than the scripted/coached ones, and make this a must-watch.

Here are the first two installments:

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about The Bachelor
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

Survivor Cochran's jury paper, new CBS gigs; Dawn and Brenda; Erik's analysis of Probst

Andy Dehnart — Fri, 24 May 2013 08:06:30 -0500

Lingering stories and information about Survivor Caramoan:

This season was the 29th most-popular TV show among people 18 to 49--just behind The Amazing Race, and well behind #18, Survivor Philippines.

John Cochran, this season's winner, has been hired to write for CBS' new sitcom The Millers, which stars Will Arnett and Margo Martindale. He'll also recap Big Brother for EW, which is kind of like working for CBS.

Cochran's famous piece of academic writing about the Survivor jury system is "not even a good essay," he told HitFix, saying it's "literally five pages long" and "was just a cute thing" that "wasn't showing any great insight. ... That's why I haven't released it."

CBS screwed up Cochran's check, which had a typo in his address.

Dawn and Brenda made up at Ponderosa after the teeth incident, Dawn told Gordon Holmes, but they didn't stay connected. She also calls Cochran "My very best friend in the whole wide world."

Rob Cesternino makes a case for promoting Survivors' Twitter handles, and I agree that there's value in it for the network to help their stars have more of a following on social media. I don't agree with his assertion that "if there's anything that Jeff Probst seems to loathe, it's the self-promoting reality star," both because of the evidence in the reunion (Boston Rob, ugh) and also because the obsession with returnees is about turning one-time players into self-promoting stars with more fans who justify their returns.

Erik Reichenbach did a Reddit AMA that is incredibly insightful and really makes me think he got a shitty edit, and is a lot more complex than the dolt the editors turned him into. He confirms that the camera operators are unintentional but useful clues about the location of the idol (one followed him when he went to pee) and says "Brandon teetered on the edge the whole time he was there. He claimed he had some kind of medication that he was not allowed to bring but I don't know if there's any validity in this." Most fascinatingly, he offers pretty pointed criticism of Jeff Probst:

"He has changed a lot. It has been 4 years in between though, and I am sure I have changed too.

... Jeff Probst Micronesia filming is 100 times greater then Jeff Probst at Caramoan. He was much more fair and generally pleasant during Micronesia compared to Survivor 26. His bias for specific players is not only unfair it is kind of ruining the future seasons. Survivor 22 is one of the worst seasons I have ever watched.

...Jeff Probst has gone from Host to show-runner I believe in the last few years. He has much more creative control which is bad in my opinion. He is a great host, but he is making some very poor choices."

Malcolm may have appeared on the Bold and the Beautiful, but Phillip Shepherd, who has a book in case you didn't know, appeared on an episode of the web series Development Hell. I don't have the slightest idea what's going on in this episode, but I like the callbacks to Survivor and Phillip's self-parody. Most of all, I want to see the reality series "Who Dat Cheater" hosted by Phillip. Fox, please put that into development ASAP.

Lisa Ferreira, who created the amazing "Hold Up, Bro" Lego musical number (have the MP3 yet?), recapped the season finale and live reunion. She was in the audience, but the recap is in Lego, of course. To close out the season, here's a reprise of "Hold Up, Bro," easily one of the highlights of this deeply hit and miss season:

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about Survivor Caramoan
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

A&E cancels Intervention after 243 interventions

Andy Dehnart — Thu, 23 May 2013 13:24:32 -0500

Intervention will end after airing five more episodes, having been cancelled by A&E.

A press release from the network spins the cancellation by announcing that it "returns for its final five episodes." Those start June 13, airing Thursdays at 9, and the last episode is, the release says, "one of the most difficult and dramatic episodes in the series' history." (For some insight into how challenging is to even film the show, a camera operator answered questions a few years ago.)

A&E EVP of programming David McKilliop said in a press release, "we're proud to have paved the way for such an original and groundbreaking series. We're honored to have been a part of the 243 interventions since its premiere in March of 2005, leading to the 156 individuals that are currently sober to this day."

The show has had a pretty high success rate (71 percent as of two years ago). One of those 243 interventions was a recent episode featuring a former cast member from the reality series Endurance.

Having found considerably more success with the scripted series Duck Dynasty, this cancellation is not a surprise. A&E also appears to have cancelled Hoarders, though it has not yet said that officially, which would mean the end of its sometimes controversial but truly reality-driven reality series that illuminated challenging but important subjects. Sad.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about Intervention
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

Amy's Baking Company keeps delivering drama, entertainment after Kitchen Nightmares

Andy Dehnart — Wed, 22 May 2013 13:10:32 -0500

This season of Kitchen Nightmares delivered what was easily the series' best episode, and since that aired, there has been a lot of off-camera drama thanks to owners Samy and Amy Bouzaglo--and viewers who responded strongly to what they saw. Their restaurant, Amy's Baking Company, has received threats from the show's producers and had a re-opening yesterday, in addition to being subjected to hacking and parody, including the mock ad below.

After the episode aired, the restaurant's Facebook page was flooded with all-caps comments lashing out at viewers, much as they had lashed out at customers on the episode. Eater archived all the posts, which are hilarious as performance art or parody.

The restaurant's owners later said they'd been hacked, though even that post seemed weird, because it insisted "our Facebook, YELP, Twitter and Website have been hacked." Yelp hadn't been hacked, it had just been flooded with negative comments (though Yelp's policy is to delete those if they're from non-patrons) just like their Facebook page.

Earlier, the server who quit during the episode did an AMA on Reddit and insisted what was on TV was 100% real and confirmed she'd received hourly pay of $8/hour, higher than a typical server. But several people pointed out this Department of Labor guideline that says employers are "prohibited from using an employee's tips for any reason other than as a credit against its minimum wage obligation to the employee." She also revealed that Gordon Ramsay left a $20 tip.

Meanwhile, Samy, whose full name is Salomon Buozaglo, may be deported; The Arizona Republic reports that he "is involved in a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement case to revoke his residency status, his lawyer said Tuesday. Scottsdale immigration lawyer David Asser said the case against his client started two years ago and was the subject of a removal hearing Monday." It is apparently unrelated to the TV show.

As a result of the negative publicity from the show, the restaurant planned a Tuesday night relaunch, for which they hired new employees who hadn't watched the show. They promised "a portion of proceeds will benefit a charity organized to bring awareness to cyber bullying" and insisted, "Customers will be able to decide who is correct: a famous celebrity chef or the marketplace that has supported the small, locally-owned business for six years."

But despite saying they had 1500 reservations, only "a thin crowd" showed up.

A representative for Amy and Samy announced the grand opening in a press release, and in it, Samy said, "We are very upset by what has taken place, apologize about the acrimony that has ensued but now must fight back to save our business. We hope and believe much good can result from what has transpired. We ask the public to keep an open mind as we begin to tell our side of the story."

But the owners cancelled a press conference and barred media from entering the restaurant after being threatened by the show's producers, ITV Studios America, whose lawyers sent a letter [PDF]:

"If you disparage the show, its host, or its producers, you will breach your obligations under Paragraph 10 of your Personal Release and Paragraph 14 of your Participant Agreement. These agreements prohibit you from speaking publicly about Kitchen Nightmares, other than to acknowledge 'the mere fact of your participation in the Series in personal publicity relating to yourself.' Your conduct exposes each of you to liability for liquidated damages of $100,000."

Of all the stupidity that has transpired during and since the production of the episode, that has got to be the stupidest. Threatening them and essentially preventing them from talking accomplishes nothing except making it seem like Samy and Amy have valid claims about how the show misrepresented them and/or their restaurant, making them look stupid.

Amy's Baking Company was doing just fine doing that on their own.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about Kitchen Nightmares
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

Why Bret Michaels wasn't on Apprentice; X Factor's new judges; NBC's fictional reality; RHONYC sign contracts

Andy Dehnart — Tue, 21 May 2013 09:44:50 -0500

The X Factor has new judges: Destiny's Child's Kelly Rowland, who also judged on the UK version of the show, and Paulina Rubio, a Latin pop star. Their addition probably brings more credibility than its panel last year, but probably doesn't change the fact that it's a giant, unwatchable mess.

Why was Bret Michaels missing in action on The Celebrity Apprentice's finale? His time on the show didn't exactly leave him looking good, but Bret tweeted that he was absent because of previous commitments: "Unfortunately I won't be able 2 attend tonight's #celebapprentice finale due 2 a private event & my daughter's b-day." He also wished Penn and Trace good luck.

NBC will air a scripted series, Siberia, that's about contestants in a competition series who have to "band together in an effort to survive" injuries and "strange occurrences." In a press release, NBC executive Jeff Bader said, "We believe a scripted series that offers an insightful behind-the-scenes view of how a reality concept comes together -- especially when things don't go according to plan -- will connect with our audience in a very satisfying way." Hopefully it's more insightful than The Office's weak, scripted look behind-the-scenes of a reality series.

The Real Housewives of New York City cast members held up production over new contracts, but Deadline reports they "took the modest pay increases Bravo was offering for season 6 rather than continue to hold out for big raises" and Bravo "also threw in a few more contractual baubles like covering expenses for additional hair and make-up for the cast.."

Want some one-on-one time with an executive at a production company or other people in the entertainment industry? Bid on several opportunities by Tuesday afternoon, including Shed Media's US GM Pamela Healey, Fremantle North America SVP of Nonfiction Development, Alex Demyanenko in LA, producer Basketball Wives Troy DeVolld, and Bob Barker (yes, from The Price is Right). Proceeds will benefit the Caucus Foundation, which says it is "helping to launch the professional careers of student filmmakers (television, film and interactive) from groups currently underrepresented in the industry."

America's Got Talent host Nick Cannon said that American Idol's producers and network "feed into" the drama between his wife Mariah Carey and Nicki Minaj; he also said that Mariah predicted the panel wouldn't work.

How social media created (and destroyed) Tila Tequila.

Teen Mom 2's Jenelle Evans talked about her heroin addiction on the reunion.

Duane Chapman settled a six-year legal dispute with Dog the Bounty Hunter executive producer Boris Krutonog, but now both are waiting for A&E to release millions of dollars they network has been holding.

Farah Abraham's porn/sex tape/thing outsold Kim K. and Ray J's sex tape. Congratulations to her.

Palestinians are competing to become "unofficial youth envoys" on a reality series.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about reality check
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

Dear NBC: Renew Apprentice but replace Donald Trump with Ivanka

Andy Dehnart — Mon, 20 May 2013 11:03:27 -0500

The first-ever all-star Celebrity Apprentice concluded with Donald Trump breaking from tradition and selecting the finalist seated to his right, Trace Adkins, as the winner of the $250,000 prize, which goes to his charity, the American Red Cross.

Overall, Adkins raised $1,554,072 for American Red Cross, while Penn Jillette raised $698,655 for Opportunity Village, according to NBC. Jillette's total for his charity, which helps people with intellectual disabilities get jobs, included $100,000 for having the best-selling Walgreens ice cream. As a reality TV character and contestant, I liked Penn better, and wish he'd won, but Trace made a compelling argument for why he should win, not that Donald Trump has ever used evidence in his decision-making.

Overall, the celebrities raised $3.332 million for charity, some of which came from the show and its sponsors. Trump also gave Lil Jon $100,000 for the American Diabetes Association, apparently as a way to make up for firing him for no actual reason.

But the celebrities also dragged down the show. The money raised for charity is the high point in a season that really sucked the life out of the franchise by retreading familiar ground and giving us nothing new in its returning celebrities, who we already knew and/or were really sick of. Its ratings recovered, but NBC didn't give it a vote of confidence by saying a renewal decision would come in the future.

I think the format still has the potential to recover, if the show can find the right cast, and also pull back a little: for starters, the live spectacle finale is pointless, because Donald Trump is no Jeff Probst, and also the show no longer justifies a live finale. I'd rather have more standard discussion and decision-making at the end of an episode rather than hear the live audience make noise.

The show needs a bold shake-up, and I'd start with replacing Donald Trump with Ivanka. He's a complete asshole who alienates viewers. She's much smarter, more engaging, and a better judge, one who can get past the bullshit and really weigh evidence.

Trump could still make appearances and pretend it's his show, but it never will be the show it once was (and still is in his mind), because his shtick is tired.

Here's the fascinating thing: Despite Trump's irrationality, the show remains an authentic competition, just one that literally has no rules. Penn Jillette told Hitfix that the show is "capricious and arbitrary but all that is out front," and insisted "Every other reality show I'd ever done, and I'd done a bunch of 'em, were deeply dishonest. And The Celebrity Apprentice isn't. Everything is straightforward. They don't even redo things. You know, on every other reality show they say, say that same thing but over here. They don't do that."

The world needs more authentic series, and again, the format has a lot of life left in it. It just needs to fire the right person.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about The Celebrity Apprentice 6
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

Duck Dynasty cast prove why they're popular, get beaten by Swamp People

Andy Dehnart — Fri, 17 May 2013 21:04:44 -0500

Duck Dynasty's extreme popularity is now as well-known as its total artificiality. It's a scripted sitcom that lies to viewers, except it's honest about one thing: its cast members' personalities.

The cast appeared on Katie Couric's talk show Wednesday, and did a good job of proving why they are entirely the reason why the show works, and why it's going to be all but impossible to duplicate its success (though a lot of networks will be trying, ugh).

They played a version of Family Feud (during which the Swamp People cast members demonstrated some remarkable Kardashian knowledge) and told stories about the show's origin. They're not exactly new to doing media or interviews, and are obviously confortable in front of cameras, but still, they're funny and charming and comfortable with being themselves, and that works.

Later on the episode, some blowhard talked for a few minutes about why rural reality shows are popular right now:

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about Duck Dynasty
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

How to know which Celebrity Apprentice Donald Trump will choose (hint: look left)

Andy Dehnart — Fri, 17 May 2013 10:44:44 -0500

The Celebrity Apprentice's sixth season concludes Sunday, and it may be easy to tell who which of the final two celebrities will win the prize for their charity: that's because Donald Trump has always chosen the celebrity sitting on his left as the show's winner.

NineDaves noticed and illustrated this fascinating phenomenon and wrote, "Why on earth would production be so stupid to put the winner in the exact same spot, season in and season out?"

Maybe because that's how Trump remembers who he's supposed to choose? It's possible this could just be a five-time coincidence, but if Trump does pick the person on the left Sunday night, that will be crazy/predictable.

The final two are Trace Adkins and Penn Jillette; both are strong finalists, and not just because they're not grating and annoying like some of their competitors. As more than one person pointed out this season, Trace kind of checked out and sleepwalked through part of it, so I'd rather see Penn win, and not just because he dished great dirt on Trump and the production.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about The Celebrity Apprentice 6
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

Top Chef's oil spill money prompts b.s. from Bravo, Anthony Bourdain vs. Andy Cohen vs. David Simon

Andy Dehnart — Fri, 17 May 2013 07:06:23 -0500

News that Top Chef received $200,000 from the oil spill fund the Deepwater Horizon disaster has prompted controversy and a debate of sorts between Bravo VP Andy Cohen, chef Anthony Bourdain, and TV auteur David Simon.

All of this was significant enough to prompt Bravo to respond last night, defending its actions by posting a statement from the city's marketing office that says its money didn't come from the oil spill fund:

"The New Orleans Tourism Marketing Corporation is giving $175,000 to invest in bringing Top Chef to New Orleans. Our investment came from our normal budget, which we planned for, not BP dollars. The BP dollars we have received are being used for our summer online advertising campaign, per our grant request for those funds."

While that may be accurate, Bravo's use of it as a defense is utter bullshit, though very clever. That's because no one is talking about the $175,000 the city paid; the original newspaper report about the funding said it was "$200,000 from the Louisiana Office of Tourism, $175,000 from the New Orleans Tourism Marketing Corp" and noted that "The state's Top Chef contribution will come from a recovery fund established by BP after the Deepwater Horizon disaster."

So, again, the controversy has always been about the state's $200,000 contribution, which Bravo's blog post ignores. Earlier this week, Anthony Bourdain suggested Bravo give back the $200,000 and offered a charity that'd be worthy of the money. Bourdain added, "My point was not that taking $$ was 'wrong' but that given circumstances and perception, a give-back would be a nice gesture."

Andy Cohen's response/defense said the money is designated for tourism, and then referenced "Treme's tax credits from NOLA." Bourdain was a writer on Treme, and that comment earned the attention of David Simon, the creator of the HBO series Treme (and other shows, such as The Wire), who received an e.mail from Bourdain about it.

And that's when David Simon crushed Andy Cohen. Simon responded in a blog post titled Why I don't tweet. Example #47, that included this epic line:

"I can't be entirely indifferent to the shitty-ass, reach-around snark of some fellow who rushes to throw under the bus people about whom he has no knowledge whatsoever -- and does so to gain a dishonest point in a fucking tweet war."

Simon wrote, "I really don't care what 'Top Chef' or Bravo does or doesn't do," but pointed out that HBO gave money to "to underwrite a long-term campaign by Treme to raise money for a series of 501c3 charities in New Orleans" that eventually raised more than $500,000." And he disputed Andy Cohen's point that there was any parallel:

"Mr. Cohen was not content to argue the merits or flaws of Mr. Bourdain’s point, or, for that matter, the merits or flaws of taking the funds in the first place. Instead, Mr. Cohen rushes to drag the Treme production into his defense, citing, in apples-to-oranges fashion, the fact that we have availed ourselves of the same Louisiana tax incentives that are standardized to every film production in that state.

[...]

For Mr. Cohen to flippantly imply that because HBO failed somehow to refuse the same tax rates that Louisiana offers to every production, we are in the same boat as 'Top Chef' and its extended negotiations for a BP payout is just, well, horseshit. Snide works well and seems plausible in 140-character morsels. When laid out in detail, it's something altogether different. Sorry, but if Mr. Cohen is any kind of mensch and thinks about it for a little longer than it takes to type the first thing on his mind, he'll see that an apology is owed."

Andy's only reply so far: "congratulations. we all love NOLA & want to bring as much business, tourism & attention to the city,chefs & gulf seafood."

Alas, he seems to have forgotten about the business and attention he wants to bring to Bravo.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about Top Chef 11
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

The Voice smartly keeping all six coaches next year, including Usher, Shakira in spring

Andy Dehnart — Thu, 16 May 2013 20:45:03 -0500

The Voice will keep all six of its judges next year, including Usher and Shakira, who have been the subject of reports in recent days suggesting they're leaving. Instead, Adam Levine and Blake Shelton will be on both seasons, while CeeLo Green and Christina Aguilera will appear in the fall with Usher and Shakira replacing them in the spring, just like this year. EW reported the news, noting that "NBC is finalizing deals with Shakira and Usher," meaning it's not 100 percent locked in yet.

Usher and Shakira have been remarkable additions to the show: the panel's chemistry has been as strong as its initial panel, and arguably even stronger, depending upon your feelings about Christina. (Compare that to American Idol, which has just stuck people with names at the judges' table and hoped it would work, and it just hasn't, even when there are strong individuals.)

While, as EW points out, some have argued that Usher and Shakira should be permanent judges, I agree that it's smart to keep the configuration the same. NBC took a big risk airing two seasons a year. Last fall, I was a little tired of the show and format, since a season with the same judges had just concluded a few months earlier. Switching between two sets of judges with similarly strong but still different chemistry makes it seem less like one endless, year-long season and instead gives us something to look forward to.

Update, 17 May 2013: NBC confirmed this today, meaning deals have been done for all four judges. NBC entertainment chair Bob Greenblatt said in a press release statement, "We're very fortunate to have these six incredible artists to weave in and out of the show as their performing and recording schedules permit. The show has taken off largely due to the rapport and commitment of these great coaches, in addition to the expert hosting of Carson Daly."

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about The Voice 4
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

What the Survivor reunion was really missing: insight

Andy Dehnart — Wed, 15 May 2013 12:17:03 -0500

In the aftermath of the Survivor Caramaon reunion drama, with the eight pre-merge contestants being excluded, there's been a lot of conversation about whether that improved or weakened the reunion. Jeff Probst was defensive in his explanation, offering a weak excuse and saying their goal is "to produce the best reunion show we can."

While excluding almost half the cast is a dramatic shift, the reunion hasn't been at its best in years. What Jeff Probst is interested in talking about or focusing on is increasingly not what I care about.

In the early days of Survivor, the show didn't use its own host as host of its reunions. Bryant Gumbel hosted the first three, back when the show was a ratings and pop culture phenomenon, and although he probably brought a bit of credibility, he lacked passion and, you know, knowledge. Rosie O'Donnell hosted the fourth season's reunion, and it's there the show discovered the value in having someone who cares about the show ask questions of the fans.

Over the early years, Jeff Probst became more of a proxy for viewers during Tribal Councils, asking the obvious but unspoken questions that we were shouting from our couches. Eventually, though, that shifted, either because of the players' savvy or Probst's increasing desperation, grandstanding, and ego.

That's spilled over into the reunions, where Probst often all but ignores the winner, especially if the winner has a vagina, to focus on things he's interested in, even if they aren't really the things I care about as a viewer.

I want to know more about the season I just watched. I want to know more about the winner's strategy from day one. I want to know about hidden alliances. I want unfiltered, unedited, straight-from-their-mouths comments, good and bad. I want to know how the game affected them in real life. I want to know what they thought of their edit, or of the challenges, or of Probst being a dick to them, unless they are an alpha male, in which case they can talk about what it's like to be Probst's bro.

Of course, maybe most viewers don't care about these things and I'm alone. At the very least, it feels like the reunion is focusing more and more on time-wasting bullshit. And while there's no need to give everyone equal time--with all due respect to the lovely cast members, I don't really give a shit if they're moving in with each other, or got new shoes or whatever--there should be a better use of time than talking to a kid in the audience and pimping Boston Rob's self-published book. It's one thing to ask Rob about Phillip's strategy and annoying behavior; another to give him a platform to grandstand.

The reunion's increasing pointlessness was highlighted today when CBS entertainment president Nina Tassler revealed during CBS' upfront presentation that the new season will feature "the return of great characters and their relatives."

The reunion teased season 27, and I can see the value of teasing it and milking the reveal for months, even if we've known the twist for more than a month. But if they were going to tell the media less than three days later, why not, after revealing its (ridiculous) name, Survivor Blood vs. Water, have Probst spend a few seconds talking about the twist, perhaps explaining why they decided to do this? Or elaborate on his rationale for relying on returnees?

Probst may have his own Twitter account, talk show, and lifeline to EW, but the reunion is by far the biggest platform of the year in part because it reaches all viewers, not just the fraction of viewers who are superfans and think they're the only people who watch. So it's a real opportunity to explain and offer insight. That's what would make the best reunion show, and Probst and company can easily deliver that if they want to.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about Survivor Caramoan
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

Probst: Non-jury wouldn't fit on stage, Brandon Hantz didn't want to come

Andy Dehnart — Tue, 14 May 2013 14:44:41 -0500

Survivor's reunion ignored every contestant who didn't make the jury, and that will probably be the case for future reunions, too, giving the show more time for host Jeff Probst to talk to random audience members and fawn over his bros. But they weren't excluded for creative reasons; instead, it was because there wasn't enough room on the set. In addition, Probst said that Brandon Hantz agreed that it wouldn't be a good idea for him to be there.

Those dubious claims are in Probst's interview with EW's Dalton Ross, who meets with a surprisingly and/or jokingly hostile Probst by questioning the decision to give someone a huge advantage for the final immunity challenge ("that's the decision we made and I can tell you that we will probably do it again. How ya like them apples?"). Here's what Probst said about Brandon and the non-jury cast:

"Regarding Brandon, we had a conversation and everyone, including Brandon, felt this was the best decision. Regarding the jury, the main reason was staging. We were on a new stage this year and our design couldn't accommodate the usual enormous amount of people we have at the reunion. But having done it once, we may do this same configuration again in the future. The truth is, it's very difficult to manage 20 people in an interview situation, and the staging last night was much more manageable. The hardest part of all of this is that it is so disappointing to the non-jury. I completely empathize with them feeling left out. Like it or not, the priority is for us to produce the best reunion show we can. Quite often when someone is voted out early they just don't have enough story to warrant a spot on the reunion show. It doesn't mean they aren't deserving people, they just didn't get to play long enough."

First, Probst's claim that Brandon also didn't want to show up was pretty much contradicted by Russell Hantz, who of course is an entirely trustworthy and objective source.

Second, the reunion show did move to a new Los Angeles location: instead of a hilarious picture of the sad pre-jury cast on Facebook. Erik, who was on stage, called it "a farce" and "insane."

Others are privately making the point that they brought guests to L.A. at their own expense, had to meet exacting wardrobe requirements (which for one person, included frantically buying new clothes), and then were completely ignored. That is a fair argument, thought in the past contestants have also been paid $10,000 just to attend the reunion, in addition to the prize money they receive depending upon when they were voted out.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about Survivor Caramoan
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

ABC kills Dancing with the Stars results, renews The Taste, orders fantasy competition

Andy Dehnart — Tue, 14 May 2013 14:03:56 -0500

Dancing with the Stars will only air on one night this fall, as ABC has cancelled its Tuesday night results shows. That's similar to the decision Fox made last year to limit So You Think You Can Dance to a single night, combining the performance and results into one awkward hour of television.

ABC said in a press release that its Monday 8 to 10 p.m. episodes will be "integrating the performance show and results show into one night and making each episode action-packed event television." Yes, I'm sure it will be.

Meanwhile, the network has awesomely renewed Shark Tank and bafflingly renewed The Taste, a show that had a low-rated and creatively weak finale after starting off with bizarre judging. Perhaps the show will fix all these problems in its second season.

The network has also ordered a reality series called The Quest, which is from the producers of The Amazing Race and Lord of the Rings, and "takes 12 lucky contestants on the journey of a lifetime when they enter the world of 'Everealm,'" which is referred to as "a land of magic and malevolence, where mythical creatures lurk in the woods, agents of darkness stir in the shadows, and mystical beings infiltrate the keep. For 12 lucky souls, a fantastic world will come alive in a unique competition series where players will engage in epic challenges."

As weird as that sounds, renewing The Taste is even weirder.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about The Taste
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

How Yelp deals with reviews from viewers of reality makeover shows

Andy Dehnart — Tue, 14 May 2013 11:04:21 -0500

Friday's epic episode of Kitchen Nightmares, on which the owners of Amy's Baking Company led Gordon Ramsay to quit, resulted in a flood of reviews of the restaurant on Yelp, but not from people who'd been there. Instead, they appeared to be from viewers who apparently needed a place to anonymously vent and be awful and abusive, based on their newfound, obviously comprehensive knowledge of what they'd only seen on TV.

This is almost predictable and common now for venues featured on makeover shows such as Bar Rescue, Restaurant: Impossible, and Tabatha Takes Over. The reality series bring attention to a venue that then gets reviewed by people who've never been there, generally focused on criticizing the people they've seen on TV. (It's interesting that, despite the usually uplifting nature of the last acts of these shows, some viewers are left with strongly negative impressions of the owners/chefs and the establishment.)

Some reviews don't reference the show, while others, such as this review of Amy's Baking Company, admit the writers' ignorance: "First off, I've never eaten at this restaurant, but I feel compelled as an American and human being, not to support this restaurant in anyway simply for the way they treat their staff and their patrons." Another review said: "I just watched the show, and it was pretty terrible."

So what does Yelp do with reviews from people who've obviously never been to the place? The site's policy is clear: reviews that are not about a reviewer's personal experience will be removed. So if someone just reviewed an establishment based on a reality TV show, it will be deleted.

I asked Yelp about this phenomenon, and was referred to its terms of service and content guidelines, the latter of which says, in part,

"We want to hear about your firsthand consumer experience, not what you heard from your co-worker or significant other. Try to tell your own story without resorting to broad generalizations and conclusory allegations."

Yelp told me that "Reviews that are deemed in violation of these guidelines will be removed by our user support team. This team is aware of the [Amy's Baking Company] issue and are currently working on it."

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about Kitchen Nightmares
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.

Cochran's unanimous Survivor win means Dawn, Sherri split second, third prizes

Andy Dehnart — Tue, 14 May 2013 08:13:52 -0500

John Cochran won Survivor with 100 percent of the jury's vote, only the third time that has happened in the show's history. So what happens to the second-place $100,000 prize? Do both Dawn Meehan and Sherri Biethman get it, or will they split it?

Actually, Dawn and Sherri will split the combined total of the second ($100,000) and third ($85,000) place prizes.

Dawn told EW's Dalton Ross, "What they do is take second and third and then divide us." He asked if they each received $92,500, and she confirmed that, meaning the third-place prize 185is $85,000.

Interestingly, in 2007, Survivor Fiji also ended with a zero-vote tie for second place, and while fourth-place Yau-Man initially said that Dreamz and Cassandra each received $100,000, but may have backtracked on that, saying they split second and third-place prizes, just like this season.

» comment on this story
» read the latest news about Survivor Caramoan
» more reality TV news and gossip on Twitter or on Facebook.